May 2, 2010

Getting Picky: MCLA-1 Tournament Projections

by Jac Coyne | Lacrosse Magazine Online Staff | Coyne Archive | Twitter

Florida State should easily snag one of the six at-large spots in the tourney. Jac Coyne predicts the entire field with seedings.

MCLA Division II Projections

Everything gets settled on Sunday night or Monday morning – depending on the whims of the committee – and we’ll finally get the 16-team tournament fields for both the MCLA Division I and Division II unveiled for Denver 2010.

I’ve got your selections right here.

Through a blend of math, deduction and reason – there is no announced criteria for the MCLA selection process – I’ve narrowed down the participants and their seeding for the nationals, which begin on Tuesday, May 11 at Dick’s Sporting Goods Park.

It was a very good year for the MCLA. There will be several tournament-quality teams left out of the Division I field and even D-II, which is in its first year, was highly competitive and also boasts numerous teams with adequate resumes. Thus my – and the committee’s – job will not be easy.

Let’s look at what we know.

We know that the committee loves a strong schedule. It showed us last year a team doesn’t even have to beat good teams – Oregon got the nod over Cal and Michigan State even though they were 0-5 against ranked teams – you just have to play them. A pretty record is not going to get you into the tourney; there must be some substance.

And that’s about all we know for sure. We should be able to triangulate the committee’s criteria a bit more this year, but until they are released for sure there is still quite a bit of guesswork involved.

Below is how it should play out.

Who’s out
Colorado (6-7) – No matter the schedule or talent level, the association can’t afford to set a precedent where a team with a losing record gains an at-large bid. As personally as some want to take it, this isn’t a Colorado issue. It’s a growth issue. Either the MCLA joins the rest of the sports world by rewarding those teams that have the ability to balance results and strength, or it further perpetuates its outlier status.

Lindenwood (12-6) – Lindenwood was probably closer to the at-large bid than people think – the Lions have played the No. 2, No. 5 and No. 6 teams in the country – so the schedule is better than a lot of teams, but the loss to Wisconsin in the semifinals of the GRLC ends that discussion.

Loyola Marymount (13-5) – The Lions were in, but Oregon gives them the heave-ho. It’s little consolation, but LMU was tourney team No. 17.

New Hampshire (11-3) – The record is there, but the strength is somewhat lacking. With Colorado dipping below .500, the Wildcats’ signature win is tempered. UNH’s run this year should give the PCLL more cred going forward, but the lack of depth in the conference makes it a one-bid league in 2010.

Texas (11-5) – The ‘Horns picked the worst time to play their worst game. Texas State is obviously a decent team, but UT will likely be kicking themselves well into the summer for letting their chance at Denver slip away because they knew all along that the LSA wasn’t going to get a second bid.

Virginia Tech (13-3) – When a team schedules Pittsburgh (5-9), Purdue (4-9) and Marquette (4-10) as its non-conference opponents, it’s either banking on the strength of its conference or it plans on winning the AQ. While the SELC is a decent league, it’s not enough to propel the Hokies into the tourney, even with the shiny record. I’m not even sure that Tech would have earned a nod with a win over Florida or Florida State considering the strength of some of the schedules it is going against. The trips to California by UF and FSU also highlight the Hokies’ travel schedule and it’s longest trip to…Greenville, N.C.?

The Field
1. Colorado State (16-1) – Yes, they lost to Michigan, but the body of work is more impressive than the Wolverines, so the Rams get the top seed. With UM at No. 2, it’s really not that big of a deal.

2. Michigan (14-1) – The Wolverines enter the tournament looking a little more vulnerable than the last two years, but don’t kid yourself: Big Blue is still the favorite.

3. Arizona State (13-3) – The Sun Devils have been flying under the radar with a front-loaded schedule, but they showed what they are capable of in the SLC championship game against Chapman. The win bumps ASU ahead of the Panthers into the No. 3 hole.

4. Chapman (14-2) – Seriously, how far can Chapman fall with their body of work? In some years it could be further, but there is no one behind them with the juice to jump ahead. They stay a semifinalist seed.

5. Minnesota-Duluth (13-3) – Undoubtedly a talented team, but we’ll see how sharp the UMLL automatic qualifier is after breezing through the back half of its schedule, when the closest game was by eight goals. The three losses for the Bulldogs were to teams (Michigan, Colorado State and Arizona State) seeded ahead of them.

6. BYU (11-5) – Not the most sterling record for the Cougars, but the strength is enough to get it into the tournament as an at-large. BYU is a lower seed than it’s used to being, and they’ll be severely tested in the first round.

7. Florida State (14-3) – The SELC tourney loss to Florida definitely hurts, and cost the Seminoles at least two seeds, but the resume is still very strong. FSU did the traveling and everything it needed to do during the regular season, so don’t expect a plummet like you saw in the polls after the Gator loss.

8. Michigan State (10-5) – You can’t argue with the schedule. The Spartans played the mettle of the MCLA and won twice as much as they lost. That’s how it’s done. Sparty is bracketed nicely by a team it lost to (FSU) and a team it beat (Oregon). The right spot.

9. Oregon (10-4) – How about those Ducks? Oregon snatches a berth just when it looked like they would be on the outside looking in. And they handled Fraser relatively easily in the PNCLL title game. They already avenged one loss and I think they’ll get a shot to do it again.

10. UC Santa Barbara (10-6) – If the Gauchos got in last year, they certainly are in this year. The wins over Florida and Loyola Marymount are clutch. The losses to Cal Poly and California were early, but could cost the Gauchos a seed or two if the committee gets picky.

11. Florida (12-3) – That was a pretty impressive run to the SELC tournament crown, especially shrugging off the regular season beatdown to Florida State and upending the ‘Noles in the quarterfinals. The head-to-head loss to UCSB puts a ceiling on how high the Gators can climb.

12. Simon Fraser (8-7)
– They’re in. Even through their ridiculously bad start to the season, the Clan just kept plugging along and now will get rewarded for not quitting. Even with the Oregon loss in the PNCLL tourney, this is not a team you want to see in your half of the bracket.

13. Cal Poly (12-4) – The WCLL is a shell of its former self after the SLC split and this seed demonstrates that. Judging by their results, the Mustangs will be in the role of spoiler in this tournament, but aren’t really threats to win it all. I’d love them to prove me wrong.

14. Illinois (12-2) – The win over Florida on the road means this is not a team to be trifled with, but the overall schedule doesn’t stack up with the teams ahead of it. I can’t see the Fighting Illini any higher than here.

15. Boston College (11-2) – The Eagles are a low seed, but only because of the relative lack of strength in the PCLL and BC’s brief non-conference foray in which they lost to Michigan State and Florida State. BC will pose problems in the tournament because they play very good defense, which always gives them a chance.

16. Texas State (12-3) – We got an inkling about what Texas State was bringing this year when it beat Cal on the road in early March, and the Bobcats took out all of the guesswork by dispatching Texas, 12-10 in the LSA title game. State didn’t play a horrible schedule, it’s just weaker than the rest of the field.

The First Round Games
No. 16 Texas State vs. No. 1 Colorado State
No. 15 Boston College vs. No. 2 Michigan
No. 14 Illinois vs. No. 3 Arizona State
No. 13 Cal Poly vs. No. 4 Chapman
No. 12 Simon Fraser vs. No. 5 Minnesota-Duluth
No. 11 Florida vs. No. 6 Brigham Young
No. 10 UC Santa Barbara vs. No. 7 Florida State
No. 9 Oregon vs. No. 8 Michigan State


RELATED HEADLINES


FOLLOW US


Lacrosse Magazine on Facebook

FOLLOW THEM

LaxMagazine.com features news, scores and standings tailored to your favorite teams.

» NCAA Division I Men
» NCAA Division I Women
» NCAA Division II Men
» NCAA Division II Women
» NCAA Division III Men
» NCAA Division III Women
» MCLA Division I Men
» MCLA Division II Men
» MLL
» NLL
» U.S. Senior Men
» U.S. Senior Women
» U.S. U19 Men
» U.S. U19 Women
» U.S. Indoor Men

View: Mobile | Desktop